![]() ![]() I am also more comfortable on a big screen (hence why I got Fesco on my desktop computer too to work on tiny details) Thank you Cloud syncingīut ultimately, it's up to you. That's also probably because I am more comfortable with Photoshop. In terms of workflow, for all things I create in Fresco, I always do some cleaning and formating in Photoshop. The only way to see if it's acceptable would be to look at it in the situation of the end product (either printed or at 100% on a regular screen, and see if it passes or not) ![]() Now there is leeway in what the human eye can see (otherwise we would have never enlarged small 35mm films to print them onto large billboards, so sometimes it's more a point of theory than anything) The real only way to not degrade anything at all is working in vector. (eg they're keeping their size internally, and all resizing doesn't add to the degradation) in any case all resizing will cause a degradation, it's just that in case of a smart layer, the degradation will only happen once, instead of adding up if you resize multiple times. So the thing using photoshop, would be to turn your layers into smart layers, which makes them "immune" to the degradation caused by multiple resizing. The real problem is not when you resize once but when you continuously resize. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |